CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.261
Sustainability assessment procedure for operations and production processes (SUAPRO)
Agostinho, Feni1,2; Silva, Thames Richard1,3; Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.1; Liu, Gengyuan2; Giannetti, Biagio F.1,2
发表日期2019
ISSN0048-9697
EISSN1879-1026
卷号685页码:1006-1018
英文摘要

Sustainability assessment is a fundamental step to support decisions towards sustainable development, and several procedures to assess the sustainability of antrophic production systems have been suggested. However, most of them lack a scientific-based construct supporting their conceptual model of sustainability, which usually results in a choice of indicator(s) without criterion that can best represent a fraction of the larger and deeper concept of sustainability. This work proposes a novel framework, named Sustainability Assessment Procedure for Operations and Production Processes (SUAPRO), supported by the PDCA four-step management method (plan, do, check, and act) and the five sectors sustainability (5SEnSU) model. Grounded on scientific bases, SUAPRO provides the steps for a sustainability assessment, including its contextualization (objectives, functional unit, boundaries, energy diagram), the choice of indicators based on the 5SEnSU model, the quantification step including goal programming as a multicriteria tool, and conclude the first cycle with a sensitivity analysis. To illustrate an application of SUAPRO, the road and railroad transportation options for soybean in Brazil are considered as a case study. Results show that the railroad mode has better performance as for the Sustainability Synthetic Indicator (SSIS of 3.6 +/- 0.4) than the road mode (SSIS of 4.0 +/- 0.3). Towards a SSIS improvement, the sensitivity analysis highlights that public policies or even private actions should be mainly focused on reducing the emergy invested in the railroad system, while the road transportation option claims effort in reducing its global warming and acidification potentials. SUAPRO is the main contribution in this work, as it tries to overcome shortcomings as usually found in scientific papers aiming to assess the sustainability of antrophic systems. The subjectivity inherent in any multicriteria method is present as the main limitation, thus all criteria used in choosing weights must be clearly presented. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.


WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/103030
作者单位1.Paulista Univ UNIP, Postgrad Program Prod Engn, Sao Paulo, Brazil;
2.Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China;
3.Fac Tecnol Rubens Lara, Santos, Brazil
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Agostinho, Feni,Silva, Thames Richard,Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.,et al. Sustainability assessment procedure for operations and production processes (SUAPRO)[J],2019,685:1006-1018.
APA Agostinho, Feni,Silva, Thames Richard,Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.,Liu, Gengyuan,&Giannetti, Biagio F..(2019).Sustainability assessment procedure for operations and production processes (SUAPRO).SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,685,1006-1018.
MLA Agostinho, Feni,et al."Sustainability assessment procedure for operations and production processes (SUAPRO)".SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 685(2019):1006-1018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Agostinho, Feni]的文章
[Silva, Thames Richard]的文章
[Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Agostinho, Feni]的文章
[Silva, Thames Richard]的文章
[Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Agostinho, Feni]的文章
[Silva, Thames Richard]的文章
[Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。